Opinion

Foreign minister reducing foreign affairs to domestic squabbles

The role of a foreign minister is crucial in shaping a nation’s diplomacy, managing international relations, and representing the country’s interests on the global stage. However, recent actions by Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Maitama Tuggar, have raised concerns about his ability to effectively handle foreign policy. Rather than focusing on diplomatic initiatives, Tuggar has often been drawn into domestic political squabbles, making statements on foreign affairs that lack depth and logic.

One notable example is the ongoing dispute between Tuggar and Bauchi State Governor Bala Mohammed. Instead of focusing on key foreign policy issues, Tuggar allowed personal and local political conflicts to spill over into his diplomatic responsibilities. His public responses, often framed by political tensions, detract from the critical issues his job description requires him to address. This focus on internal squabbles risks damaging the country’s international credibility and distracting from vital diplomatic efforts.

Such domestic conflicts can also prompt concern from international stakeholders, as they detract from important global diplomatic initiatives. When a foreign minister prioritizes local political battles, it can create the impression that national interests are being sacrificed for short-term political gain. This undermines the country’s credibility in negotiations and strains relations with foreign partners, as other nations may perceive Nigeria as politically unstable or distracted.

Tuggar’s response to concerns over the frequency of President Bola Tinubu’s foreign trips further highlights the lack of depth in his approach. Rather than addressing substantive issues like the large presidential entourage, Tuggar focused solely on the number of trips and the deals that are signed.

Nigerians, however, are more concerned about the number of people in the entourage that strain the exchequer coffers, especially given the country’s economic challenges.

Another significant misstep was Tuggar’s response to Professor Yusuf Banguara’s remarks about Nigeria’s acceptance into BRICS. Banguara had expressed concerns about Nigeria’s positioning in the global economic landscape, especially regarding BRICS. Instead of offering a thoughtful, strategic response, Tuggar dismissed these concerns in a manner that was overly simplistic and elementary for someone of his experience. His statement that Nigeria’s BRICS status depends on what former US President Donald Trump might do is not only unsubstantiated but also naïve. This rhetoric fails to address the complexity of international diplomacy and undermines the serious work required to position Nigeria effectively within global organizations.

Tuggar’s logic that Nigeria’s position in BRICS is contingent on external political factors, like Trump’s actions, reveals a troubling lack of strategic foresight. This approach reduces complex foreign policy issues to overly simplistic arguments, undermining Nigeria’s credibility as a global partner. It is concerning for a senior foreign official to focus on such short-sighted perspectives, rather than engaging in the thoughtful, long-term diplomatic planning needed to secure Nigeria’s interests internationally.

Instead of getting bogged down in domestic squabbles and offering superficial responses to critical international issues, Tuggar should focus on elevating Nigeria’s global standing. There are numerous opportunities to foster discussions on Nigeria’s foreign policy, including convening conferences and engaging think tanks like the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA) and various political science departments in Nigerian universities. These institutions are equipped to analyze and recommend effective foreign policies. Tuggar could utilize these resources to chart a clear, strategic course for Nigeria’s international engagements.

Ultimately, the foreign minister’s role is to manage Nigeria’s foreign relations with expertise, tackle global challenges such as climate change, trade, and security, and strengthen diplomatic ties. Rather than distracting the public with internal political squabbles and ill-founded claims, Mr Minister Tuggar should lead in shaping Nigeria’s foreign policy in a way that influences the country’s place on the world stage for years to come.

One Comment

  1. Absolutely, Nigeria’s foreign policy under the current Minister must prioritize strengthening of diplomatic ties, economic cooperation, and regional stability. As Africa’s largest economy and a key player in ECOWAS, Nigeria has a responsibility to lead in addressing regional challenges, particularly in light of recent political instability in West Africa. By reinforcing its role within ECOWAS and the African Union, Nigeria can mediate conflicts and promote stability. Additionally, forging deeper relationships with global powers such as the U.S., China, and the European Union, while also expanding ties with emerging markets that will enhance Nigeria’s global standing and economic opportunities.

    Security remains a crucial issue that requires strategic foreign policy engagement. Nigeria continues to face serious threats from terrorism, insurgency, and maritime piracy, necessitating stronger regional and international security collaborations. The ministry can work closely with neighboring countries through the Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF) to help combat extremism, while enhanced maritime security cooperation with global partners can protect trade routes in the Gulf of Guinea. Simultaneously, Nigeria must leverage trade agreements like the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA) to boost economic growth, diversify trade partnerships, and attract foreign investment. A good economic diplomacy strategy will create new opportunities beyond traditional partners, reducing economic vulnerabilities.

    Beyond security and trade, climate change and environmental diplomacy should be at the forefront of Nigeria’s foreign relations agenda. As the country faces increasing climate-related challenges, Tuggar’s leadership should focus on securing climate financing and fostering partnerships to address environmental concerns. He can equally engaging in global climate negotiations and prioritizing sustainable development, Nigeria can position itself as a leader in Africa’s transition to renewable energy. All these objectives are open for the foreign minister to address, facing these task, he must avoid political distractions and internal conflicts and must focus on long-term strategies that elevate Nigeria’s influence on the world stage.

Back to top button