fbpx
ColumnOpinion

ECOWAS and the consequences of sanctions and suspension of member states

Central to these issues is the fallout surrounding the suspension and subsequent sanctions imposed by ECOWAS on the Alliance of Sahel States (AES)—comprising Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso

In recent years, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has faced unprecedented challenges stemming from internal disagreements and external geopolitical pressures. Central to these issues is the fallout surrounding the suspension and subsequent sanctions imposed by ECOWAS on the Alliance of Sahel States (AES)—comprising Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso—as a result of complex geopolitical rivalries between great powers over the Sahel region, particularly involving the United States and France, on one hand, and Russia, on the other. This incident has significantly strained the unity and efficacy of ECOWAS, once hailed as a beacon of regional cooperation in Africa.

Under the chairmanship of President Bola Ahmad Tinubu of Nigeria, ECOWAS embarked on a controversial path of sanctioning Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. This decision, ostensibly taken to address regional security concerns and uphold democratic values within the region, has had far-reaching consequences that threaten to undermine decades of regional integration efforts.

Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso, countries with deep-rooted historical and social ties to the rest of ECOWAS, found themselves at odds with the regional body due to internal political upheavals and perceived failures to adhere to democratic norms. While these states acknowledge their challenges, they sought understanding and leniency from ECOWAS member states, citing the need to address their economic hardships and their shared struggles against terrorism.

President Tinubu’s stance as a self-proclaimed ‘democratic champion’ further exacerbated tensions within ECOWAS, leading to accusations of unilateral decision-making and a lack of consensus-building among member states. This rift has not only weakened ECOWAS institutional framework but also eroded trust and solidarity among member states, which is crucial for addressing common regional challenges.

The suspension of the AES states has led to a shift in their focus towards Guinea, a member state of ECOWAS with its own political and economic dynamics. This strategic realignment may create an Atlantic corridor, which could disrupt traditional trade routes within ECOWAS and affect the established economic flows and revenue streams of other West African states.

Additionally, the sanctions imposed on three states have had unintended consequences. Today, the effects of those sanctions have boomeranged and are negatively impacting Nigeria, the economic powerhouse of the region, and the Republic of Benin. The disruption in trade and economic activities has not only resulted in financial losses but has also increased the risk of terrorism and transnational crimes for these states, which were previously mitigated by regional solidarity under ECOWAS.

In response to their suspension and treatment within ECOWAS, the AES states declared their intention to withdraw from the regional bloc. This move represents a significant setback for ECOWAS, as it may lose key strategic partners in the fight against terrorism and instability in the Sahel region.

Mali’s Assimi Goita, Niger’s General Abdourahamane Tiani and Burkina Faso’s Captain Ibrahim Traore pose for photographs during the first ordinary summit of heads of state and governments of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) in Niamey, Niger July 6, 2024. REUTERS/Mahamadou Hamidou

Last Friday, Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger held their first summit as AES in Niamey, where they signed a confederation treaty to deepen integration among their nations, aiming to unite a population of 72 million. This treaty marks their departure from ECOWAS, which they accused of being influenced by France. They have also severed military ties with France, opting for increased cooperation with Russia.

The new alliance aims to enhance joint military efforts against jihadist groups and to collaborate in key sectors such as agriculture, water, energy, and transport. Moreover, they emphasized the promotion of indigenous languages in local media.

The AES withdrawal from the ECOWAS poses a threat of creating a security vacuum and economic strain, as these countries have served as buffers against extremist activities and illicit trafficking routes. The remaining member states will now have to address these challenges, which will further stretch their limited resources and capacity.

The situation surrounding the AES states and their suspension from ECOWAS highlights the fragility of regional integration efforts in Africa, given the competing geopolitical interests and internal political dynamics. The unilateral actions taken under President Tinubu’s chairmanship have not only weakened ECOWAS’ unity but also jeopardized its ability to effectively tackle pressing regional challenges by contracting the region politically, geographically, economically, and demographically.

To restore trust and cooperation within ECOWAS, it will be necessary to engage in genuine dialogue, compromise, and reaffirm commitment to democratic principles and regional solidarity. To bring back these states into ECOWAS, strategic initiatives must cover political, economic, and developmental dimensions. Politically, ECOWAS should engage in high-level discussions aimed at addressing and resolving any grievances that led to the AES states’ withdrawal.

Conflict mediation efforts should be prioritized to address underlying tensions and rebuild trust among member states. Economically, ECOWAS should propose joint infrastructure projects and offer enhanced trade agreements and economic incentives to showcase the benefits of regional integration. Development aid should be targeted towards supporting socioeconomic growth in AES states.

Drawing upon the lessons learned from the AES incident, ECOWAS must prioritize regional security initiatives, such as peacekeeping operations and conflict resolution mechanisms, to ensure stability and security. Strengthening institutional capacities and governance structures through technical assistance and skills development programs will be crucial in enhancing local governance and public service delivery within AES states.

Moreover, fostering cross-border cultural exchanges and promoting social development initiatives will be essential in nurturing a sense of regional solidarity and identity. Public diplomacy efforts, including awareness campaigns and media engagement, should emphasize ECOWAS’ role in fostering peace, stability, and prosperity across West Africa.

By offering flexible membership options and strategic partnerships tailored to the needs of AES states, ECOWAS can ensure inclusivity and sustainable regional cooperation. It is crucial to continuously monitor progress and adapt strategies to achieve long-term integration goals.

As ECOWAS navigates the challenges of regional integration, it is essential to recognize the complex nature of these processes, especially when confronted with external challenges and internal disputes. Collaborating towards resolution and shared comprehension can help ECOWAS reclaim its role as a significant contributor to the stability and growth of West Africa.

Back to top button

Discover more from Dateline Nigeria

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading