fbpx
ColumnOpinion

Northern Nigeria’s industrial development (II): The impact of differentiated education

The educational policies implemented during British colonial rule have had a long-lasting impact on Nigeria’s industrial development, particularly in the northern regions. While the southern regions of Nigeria embraced Western education, the north remained resistant, with deeply ingrained cultural and religious beliefs hindering the development of a modern workforce. These regional disparities in education, particularly between the north and south, have contributed to ongoing socio-economic challenges and industrial underdevelopment in northern Nigeria.

Before British colonization, Nigeria’s northern and western regions were home to advanced empires and kingdoms, each with distinct educational systems based on local cultures, religions, and political structures. In the north, Islam played a significant role in shaping the educational system, with a strong focus on Qur’anic education. The southern regions, on the other hand, saw a wider diversity of educational traditions, which included indigenous forms of education as well as the introduction of Western schooling, largely through Christian missionary activities in mid-19th century.

In 1842, Christian missionaries introduced Western education in southern Nigeria, primarily as a means of spreading Christianity. Missionaries established schools that promoted literacy in English and local languages, taught agriculture, and trained local clergy and schoolmasters. Over time, these missionary schools laid the foundation for a formal, Western-style education system in the south. However, this same educational model met resistance in northern Nigeria. The British colonial government’s indirect rule policies further entrenched this divide by restricting the spread of Western education, particularly in the Muslim-majority north.

In the north, especially in predominantly Muslim areas like Borno Province, Western education was often viewed with suspicion and hostility. Local communities labeled these schools Makaranta kerdibe, meaning “the school of the infidels,” associating them with paganism and foreign influence. Keen to avoid backlash such as the Mahdist rebellions of 1905-06 from the local Muslim population, the British imposed strict limitations on missionary activities, which kept Western education from gaining a foothold. Instead, the north remained deeply focused on Qur’anic education, which emphasized religious teachings, Arabic language, craft and trading skills. Thus, the people shunned literacy in English and the technical knowledge it pretended to share.

The 1914 amalgamation of the northern and southern protectorates into a single colony further highlighted the stark differences in educational development between the two regions. The south had already embraced formal Western education and was beginning to develop schools at the primary and secondary levels, and was already on its way to have the first tertiary itsitution. Meanwhile, the north lagged. By 1944, the educational systems of northern and southern Nigeria were clearly differentiated: in the north, religious schools dominated, while the south was increasingly shaped by Western education.

In response to the growing educational divide, the British government introduced the 1948 Education Ordinance, which sought to standardize education across the colony. However, despite the policy’s intentions, educational systems remained highly uneven. The south, especially the Western and Eastern regions, continued to develop formal educational institutions, which included a strong emphasis on technical and industrial skills. By contrast, the north remained largely isolated from these developments, and its educational system was still primarily focused on religious instruction.

The post-World War II period saw a growing demand for national development and educational reform, particularly in the lead-up to Nigeria’s independence in 1960. Nationalists, influenced by global movements for self-determination, pushed for an educational system that would prepare Nigeria for industrialization and modernization. However, while the southern regions developed skilled workforces, the north remained largely resistant to the expansion of Western-style education. This reluctance was compounded by a general mistrust of Western education, which many viewed as incompatible with local culture and religion.

The 1954 Constitution, which granted greater regional autonomy, allowed the northern region to develop its educational system independently. While the Western and Eastern regions moved forward with universal primary education programs and established technical schools, the north remained deeply divided over education. A significant portion of the population continued to resist sending children to government schools, and many northern states still favored religious education over secular schooling.

The 1959 Sir Eric Ashby Commission, tasked with evaluating Nigeria’s higher education needs, identified the education divide as a major barrier to national industrialization. The report highlighted the urgent need for a skilled labor force capable of supporting the country’s industrial and economic development. However, the divide between the north and south in educational attainment was a significant hindrance to the creation of a unified, modern workforce.

Colonial educational policies in Nigeria have drawn comparisons to British strategies in other colonies, such as India and Hong Kong, where education systems were used to reinforce divisions within society. In India, for example, the British concentrated educational resources on a small elite, leaving much of the population without the skills necessary for industrialization. After independence, India made significant efforts to expand technical education, which played a key role in its industrial growth. Similarly, in Hong Kong, the British focused on trade-oriented education, which helped fuel rapid industrialization.

In Nigeria, however, the educational divide created by British colonialism proved to be an obstacle to industrial development. While the southern regions developed a more literate, skilled workforce capable of supporting industrialization, the north struggled to catch up. The lack of access to modern education in the north, combined with the cultural resistance to Western schooling, created a significant barrier to the region’s industrial progress. The British colonial practice of indirect rule in the north ensured that the educational system remained under the control of local elites, who were often resistant to the changes brought about by Western education.

The effects of this educational divide are still felt today. The north’s lack of technical and industrial education has created a significant gap in the development of a skilled labor force. While the south has experienced some success in industrialization, the north remains underdeveloped, with lower literacy rates and fewer skilled workers. This imbalance in educational development has contributed to persistent socio-economic inequalities between the two regions, with the north lagging behind in terms of industrial growth and economic development.

In conclusion, the colonial educational policies that were implemented in Nigeria during British rule played a critical role in shaping the country’s industrial development, particularly in the north. The educational divide between the north and south, reinforced by the British practice of indirect rule and cultural resistance to Western education, continues to hinder Nigeria’s efforts to fully industrialize. This imbalance has had lasting effects on northern Nigeria’s industrial and economic development, and efforts to bridge this gap remain a key challenge for the country’s future.

Leave a comment

Back to top button

Discover more from Dateline Nigeria

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading